Philosophy and Literature 33 (2):315-328 (2009)
Arthur C. Danto taught that an artwork’s identity and content depend on "an atmosphere of theory the eye cannot de[s]cry" (1964:580). By "theory", he did not mean the ideas developed by philosophers of art. His point was that an artwork can be properly recognized and appreciated only when seen in relation to the heritage of works, writings, practices, genres, and conventions that form the ground on which it stands out as subject. In brief, the work must be seen against the backdrop of what he dubbed (1964) the art world.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Aesthetic and Ethical Mediocrity in Art.Katherine Thomson - 2002 - Philosophical Papers 31 (2):199-215.
The Wake of Art: Essays: Criticism, Philosophy and the Ends of Taste.Arthur Coleman Danto - 1998 - G+B Arts Int'l.
The World and the Work of Art.Andrea Rehberg - 2009 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (1):131-142.
Contextualism, Art, and Rigidity: Levinson, Currie and Davies. [REVIEW]Božidar Kante - 2005 - Acta Analytica 20 (4):53-63.
Some Objections to Stecker's Historical Functionalism.K. Stock - 2000 - British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (4):479-491.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads404 ( #5,695 of 2,153,830 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #40,212 of 2,153,830 )
How can I increase my downloads?