Dissertation, Harvard University (2018)

Authors
Byron Davies
Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero
Abstract
Jean-Jacques Rousseau is often associated with a certain political form of relating to another as a person, where a person is seen as a locus of enforceable demands. Nevertheless, as I argue in this dissertation, Rousseau also articulated an affective form of relating to another, where relating to another as a person in this sense involves seeing them as a locus of a kind of value that cannot be demanded. I consider the significance of this affective form for Rousseau’s understanding of the passion he calls amour-propre, as well for his understanding of domination and of the connection between the political and affective realms. Following an introductory chapter, I argue in Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 that, against received readings of Rousseau, there is something intrinsically good about being subject to amour-propre in that this passion makes salient to us others’ personhood. In Chapter 4 I consider one way in which the characteristic pathology of the affective realm is the appearance of demands in it. I show how, in a certain kind of domination, the dominator acknowledges the affective personhood of the dominated and at the same time, by treating the dominated’s consideration as the sort of value that can be extracted, is in violation of the very conditions of that acknowledgment. In Chapter 5 I outline Rousseau’s understanding of the connection between the political and affective forms of relating to another by arguing that Rousseau introduces the former as an essential part of the egalitarian measures he proposes for eliminating the necessity of entering relationships of domination. I then contrast Rousseau’s understanding of the connection between the political and the affective realms with contemporary Kantian accounts that condense political and affective phenomena into a single conception of a person. In Appendix 1 I consider the kind of dependence on another person involved in speaking to them. I discuss how that dependence is made apparent when we are insulted in not being believed, and I compare the views of Rousseau and Adam Smith regarding that kind of insult. Finally, in Appendix 2 I bring Rousseau’s notion of acknowledging another as a person to bear on an interpretation of the work of the Spanish filmmaker Víctor Erice.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,735
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rousseau on Dependence and the Formation of Political Society.David James - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):343-366.
Rousseau and Ethics.Christopher Bertram - 2013 - In Roger Crisp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics. Oxford University Press.
What’s Wrong with Inequality? Some Rousseauian Perspectives.Robin Douglass - 2015 - European Journal of Political Theory 14 (3):368-377.
Rousseau: The Sentiment of Existence.David Gauthier - 2006 - Cambridge University Press.
The Two Faces of Domination in Republican Political Theory.Michael J. Thompson - 2018 - European Journal of Political Theory 17 (1):1474885115580352.
A Rousseau Dictionary.C. J. B. & N. J. H. Dent - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 43 (173):582.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-08-12

Total views
4 ( #1,224,047 of 2,432,439 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #465,713 of 2,432,439 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes