Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):81 - 87 (1992)

Corporations have scrambled to bring to market products positioned and advertised as addressing the needs of the environmentally-conscious consumer. The vast majority of claims presented in support of these products are best described, however, as confused, misleading or outright illegal. Ethical considerations have not yet been integrated into environmental marketing, and as a result, long-term harm on both the individual and societal level may result. A framework for reversing this trend is presented. It identifies the sequence of actions necessary for the development and communication of ethical environmental marketing claims. The sequence is based upon two aspects of ethical theory: moral style and normative behavior. Specific implications for marketers'' actions at each stage in the sequence of framework development are also discussed.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00872314
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,908
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Convention: A Philosophical Study.David Kellogg Lewis - 1969 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Autonomy and Benevolent Lies.Thomas E. Hill - 1984 - Journal of Value Inquiry 18 (4):251-267.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
61 ( #184,947 of 2,497,775 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #428,370 of 2,497,775 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes