Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (12):852-856 (2017)
Abstract |
As we aggressively pursue research to cure and prevent Alzheimer’s disease, we encounter important ethical challenges. None of these challenges, if handled thoughtfully, would pose insurmountable barriers to research. But if they are ignored, they could slow the research process, alienate potential study subjects and do damage to research recruits and others. These challenges are the necessity of very large cohorts of research subjects, recruited for lengthy studies, probably ending only in the subjects’ death; the creation of cohorts of ’study ready' volunteers, many of whom will be competent to consent at the beginning of the process, but move into cognitive impairment later; reliance on adaptive trial design, creating challenges for informed consent, equipoise and justice; the use of biomarkers and predictive tests that describe risk rather than certainty, and that can threaten participants’ welfare if the information is obtained by insurance companies or long-term care providers; the use of study partners that creates unique risks of harm to the relationship of subject and study partner. We need greater attention, at all levels, to these complex ethical issues. Work on these issues should be included in research plans, from the federal to the local, and should be supported through NIH in the same way that it supported work on the ethical, legal and social implications of genetic research.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1136/medethics-2016-103392 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Defining and Describing Benefit Appropriately in Clinical Trials.Nancy M. P. King - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4):332-343.
Alzheimer Disease and Pre-Emptive Suicide.Dena S. Davis - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (8):543-549.
Ethical Considerations for Outcome‐Adaptive Trial Designs: A Clinical Researcher's Perspective.Scott Brian Saxman - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (2):59-65.
Both Sides of the Coin: Randomization From the Perspectives of Physician-Investigators and Patient-Subjects.Eric D. Kodish, Kathleen A. Kassimatis & Tsiao Yi Yap - 2010 - Ethics and Behavior 20 (5):380-386.
Citations of this work BETA
The ethics of innovation for Alzheimer’s disease: the risk of overstating evidence for metabolic enhancement protocols.Timothy Daly, Ignacio Mastroleo, David Gorski & Stéphane Epelbaum - 2020 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 41 (5):223-237.
The Full Spectrum of Ethical Issues in Dementia Research: Findings of a Systematic Qualitative Review.Tim G. Götzelmann, Daniel Strech & Hannes Kahrass - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-11.
Planning Ahead for Dementia Research Participation: Insights From a Survey of Older Australians and Implications for Ethics, Law and Practice.Nola Ries, Elise Mansfield & Rob Sanson-Fisher - 2019 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16 (3):415-429.
Similar books and articles
Research Involving Subjects with Alzheimer’s Disease in Italy: The Possible Role of Family Members.Corinna Porteri & Carlo Petrini - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):12.
Ethical Aspects of Research Into Alzheimer Disease. A European Delphi Study Focused on Genetic and Non-Genetic Research.A. van der Vorm, M. J. F. J. Vernooij-Dassen, P. G. Kehoe, M. G. M. O. Rikkert, E. van Leeuwen & W. J. M. Dekkers - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (2):140-144.
Mental Competence, Caregivers, and the Process of Consent: Research Involving Alzheimer's Patients or Others with Decreasing Mental Capacity.David E. Guinn - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (3):230-245.
Issues Involving Informed Consent for Research Participants with Alzheimer’s Disease.Adnan Qureshi & Amer Johri - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):197-203.
Protecting Human Subjects in Internet Research.Larry Pace & Mary Livingston - 2005 - Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies 10 (1):35-41.
Re-Consenting Human Subjects: Ethical, Legal and Practical Issues.D. B. Resnik - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (11):656-657.
Ethical Issues in Qualitative Nursing Research.Immy Holloway & Stephanie Wheeler - 1995 - Nursing Ethics 2 (3):223-232.
Questionable Research Practices Compel Subjects to Join Studies.David Resnik - 2007 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 30 (29).
Ethical Issues in Cancer Chemoprevention Trials: Considerations for IRBs and Investigators.Julia Slutsman, David Buchanan & Christine Grady - 2007 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 29 (2):1-6.
Ethical International Research on Human Subjects Research in the Absence of Local Institutional Review Boards.S. B. Bhat - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (9):535-536.
Protecting People in Research: A Comparison Between Biomedical and Traffic Research. [REVIEW]Sara Svensson & Sven Ove Hansson - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):99-115.
Challenging Research on Human Subjects: Justice and Uncompensated Harms.Stephen Napier - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (1):29-51.
Piercing the Veil: Ethical Issues in Ethnographic Research.Brian Schrag - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2):135-160.
Pharmacogenetics: The Bioethical Problem of DNA Investment Banking.Oonagh P. Corrigan & Bryn Williams-Jones - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (3):550-565.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-11-24
Total views
27 ( #423,325 of 2,507,504 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,626 of 2,507,504 )
2017-11-24
Total views
27 ( #423,325 of 2,507,504 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,626 of 2,507,504 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads