A number of those actively involved in the physical sciences anticipate the creation of a unified approach to all human knowledge based on reductionism in physics and Platonism in mathematics. We argue that it is implausible that this goal will ever be achieved, and argue instead for a pluralistic approach to human understanding, in which mathematically expressed laws of nature are merely one way among several of describing a world that is too complex for our minds to be able to grasp in its entirety.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Pluralism, Logical Empiricism, and the Problem of Pseudoscience.George A. Reisch - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (2):333-348.
Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics: Democracy, Pluralism, and the Management of Nature.Ben A. Minteer & Robert E. Manning - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (2):191-207.
Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom: A Tour of Logical Pluralism.Roy T. Cook - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (6):492-504.
The Ontological Autonomy of the Chemical World.Olimpia Lombardi & Martín Labarca - 2004 - Foundations of Chemistry 7 (2):125-148.
Pluralism, Indeterminacy and the Social Sciences: Reply to Ingram and Meehan. [REVIEW]James Bohman - 1997 - Human Studies 20 (4):441-458.
Religious Pluralism and Pluralistic Religion: John Hick's Epistemological Foundation of Religious Pluralism and an Explanation of Islamic Epistemology Toward Diversity of Unique Religion.Seyed Hassan Hosseini - 2010 - The Pluralist 5 (1):94-109.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #265,421 of 2,152,480 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #281,161 of 2,152,480 )
How can I increase my downloads?