Bioethics 30 (6):462-468 (2016)

Ben Davies
Oxford University
Greg Bognar has recently offered a prioritarian justification for ‘fair innings’ distributive principles that would ration access to healthcare on the basis of patients' age. In this article, I agree that Bognar's principle is among the strongest arguments for age-based rationing. However, I argue that this position is incomplete because of the possibility of ‘time-relative' egalitarian principles that could complement the kind of lifetime egalitarianism that Bognar adopts. After outlining Bognar's position, and explaining the attraction of time-relative egalitarianism, I suggest various ways in which these two kinds of principle could interact. Since various options have very different implications for age-based rationing, proponents of such a rationing scheme must take a position on time-relative egalitarianism to complement a lifetime prioritarian view like Bognar's.
Keywords welfare  healthcare  age  egalitarianism  rationing
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/bioe.12234
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Health, Priority to the Worse Off, and Time.Anders Herlitz - 2018 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (4):517-527.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Inequalities in Health and Intergenerational Equity.Alan Williams - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (1):47-55.
Fair Innings.Greg Bognar - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (4):251-261.
Age-Weighting.Greg Bognar - 2008 - Economics and Philosophy 24 (2):167-189.
The Fair Innings Argument and Increasing Life Spans.A. Farrant - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (1):53-56.
Time-Relative Interests and Abortion.S. Liao - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):242-256.
Self Visitation, Traveler Time, and Compatible Properties.John W. Carroll - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):359-370.
To Be Fair.Benjamin L. Curtis - 2014 - Analysis 74 (1):47-57.
Relative and Absolute Presence.Sean Enda Power - 2016 - In B. Mölder, V. Arstila & P. Øhrstrøm (eds.), Philosophy and Psychology of Time. Springer. pp. 69-100.
Why Does Time Pass?Bradford Skow - 2012 - Noûs 46 (2):223-242.
History and the Concept of Relative Time.W. Leyden - 1963 - History and Theory 2 (3):263-285.


Added to PP index

Total views
136 ( #77,828 of 2,448,174 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #38,278 of 2,448,174 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes