Philosophy 58 (225):392 - 395 (1983)
Wittgenstein remarks in the "Tractatus" that the eye is not in the visual field. I question the claim of Michael Dummett and P T Geach that reflection on this remark helps one conceive of an observer perceiving objects in space without having any location in that space. The literal meaning of "point of view" is illustrated by the visual field. Reflection on the fact that the point of view is not itself normally an object of sight is no help in conceiving perception from no point of view.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kant on Space, Empirical Realism and the Foundations of Geometry.William Harper - 1984 - Topoi 3 (2):143-161.
Similar books and articles
How to Define an Object: Evidence From the Effects of Action on Perception and Attention.Glyn W. Humphreys & M. Jane Riddoch - 2007 - Mind and Language 22 (5):534–547.
Perception and Action Planning: Getting It Together.David A. Westwood & Melvyn A. Goodale - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):907-908.
Does Visual Spatial Awareness Require the Visual Awareness of Space?John Schwenkler - 2012 - Mind and Language 27 (3):308-329.
The Perception of Time and the Notion of a Point of View.Christoph Hoerl - 1998 - European Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):156-171.
Pause of Participation. On the Function of Artificial Presence.Lambert Wiesing - 2011 - Research in Phenomenology 41 (2):238-252.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads14 ( #329,613 of 2,158,194 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #356,322 of 2,158,194 )
How can I increase my downloads?