Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):450-475 (2009)

It is widely held that there is a legal right to privacy that plays such a central role in a number of important US Supreme Court decisions. There is however a great deal of dispute about whether there is a moral right to privacy and if there is, what grounds the right. Before this can be determined, we must be clear about the nature of privacy, something that is not clearly understood and that, as we shall see, is often confused with the right to privacy. I shall begin with a critical discussion of various views about the nature of privacy. I shall then present my own account, and show how it meets the objections that have been raised against other views. Lastly, I shall close with a discussion about whether privacy is a moral right.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01349.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,486
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Written for the Moment.Joseph S. Fulda - 2012 - Journal of Information Ethics 21 (1):21-26.
Privacy and Democracy.Paul Voice - 2016 - South African Journal of Philosophy 35 (3):1-9.
A Defense of Privacy as Control.Leonhard Menges - forthcoming - The Journal of Ethics:1-18.
The Ethics of Police Body-Worn Cameras.Frej Klem Thomsen - forthcoming - Moral Philosophy and Politics 7 (1):97-121.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
208 ( #45,543 of 2,421,633 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #249,654 of 2,421,633 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes