Interested Vegetables, Rational Emotions, and Moral Status

Philosophy Research Archives 11:531-550 (1985)
Abstract
Many discussions of the moral status of “mindless beings” such as the permanently comatose, the dead, trees, and human fetuses seem to take for granted the thesis that it is improper to appeal to emotions to establish the fundamental distinction between “persona” (beings capableof rights “in their own right”) and “things” (beings not capable of rights except in some fictional or iIlusory sense). Persons are persons, however we may feel about them.That thesis seems to be a major obstacle to any nonutilitarian account of the personhood of mindless beings.I argue that the thesis of independence is true, if at aIl, only for one class of persons (“rational agents”). Beyond that class, our emotional response to a being can be relevant to its moral status. Acting on some consideration (or believing something in virtue of it) can be rational inthe “constitutive”, “regulative”, or “associative” sense. A consideration is a good reason if it is rational in any of these senses. The importance of this claim is shown by briefly examining Feinberg’s weIl-known argument that it is a conceptual truth that mindless beings are incapable ofrights. His argument assumes that our emotions cannot be rational in the appropriate sense and coIlapses without that assumption
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  History of Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0164-0771
DOI 10.5840/pra19851132
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,727
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Emotions and Rationality.Isabella Muzio - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):135-145.
Conferred Rights and the Fetus.Ronald M. Green - 1974 - Journal of Religious Ethics 2 (1):55 - 75.
Rational Emotion, Emotional Holism, True Love, and Charlie Chaplin.Michael Levine - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Research 24:487-504.
Human Enhancement and Supra-Personal Moral Status.Thomas Douglas - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):473-497.
The Basis of Human Moral Status.S. Matthew Liao - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (2):159-179.
Kant's Invidious Humanism.Christina Hoff - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (1):63-70.
The Substance View: A Critique.Rob Lovering - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (5):263-70.
Fichte and the Relationship Between Self-Positing and Rights.Nedim Nomer - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):469-490.
'Ought' and Well-Being.Grant Gillett - 1993 - Inquiry 36 (3):287 – 306.
Moral Status as a Matter of Degree?David DeGrazia - 2008 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):181-198.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-12-02

Total downloads

7 ( #509,166 of 2,146,490 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #386,103 of 2,146,490 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums