Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (3):493-555 (2011)
The primary purpose of government is to secure public goods that cannot be achieved by free markets. The Coordination Principle tells us to consolidate sovereign power in a single institution to overcome collective action problems that otherwise prevent secure provision of the relevant public goods. There are several public goods that require such coordination at the global level, chief among them being basic human rights. The claim that human rights require global coordination is supported in three main steps. First, I consider Pogge's and Habermas's analyses as alternatives to Hobbesian conceptions of justice. Second, I consider the core conventions of international law, which are in tension with the primacy of state sovereignty in the UN system. Third, I argue that the just war tradition does not limit just causes for war to self-defense; it supports saving innocent third parties from crimes against humanity as a just reason for war. While classical authors focused less on this issue, the point is especially clear in twentieth-century just war theories, such as those offered by the American Catholic bishops, Jean Elshtain, Brian Orend, and Michael Walzer. Against Walzer, I argue that we add intractable military tyranny to the list of horrors meriting intervention if other ad bellum conditions are met. But these results require us to reexamine the "just authority" of first resort to govern such interventions. The Coordination Principle implies that we should create a transnational federation with consolidated powers in place of a treaty organization requiring near-unanimity. But to be legitimate, such a global institution must also be directly answerable to the citizens of its member states. While the UN Security Council is inadequate on both counts, a federation of democracies with a directly elected executive and legislature could meet both conditions
|Keywords||collective action problems Luban United Nations state sovereignty league of democracies Orend Habermas human rights public goods global governance Walzer crimes against humanity just cause for war|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Jürgen Habermas - 1996 - Polity.
Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law.Allen E. Buchanan - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Humanitarian Intervention, Altruism, and the Limits of Casuistry.Richard B. Miller - 2000 - Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (1):3 - 35.
Humanitarian Intervention, Consent, and Proportionality.Jeff McMahan - 2009 - In N. Ann Davis, Richard Keshen & Jeff McMahan (eds.), Ethics and Humanity: Themes From the Philosophy of Jonathan Glover. Oxford University Press.
Are Humanitarian Military Interventions Obligatory?Jovana Davidovic - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):134–144.
Just War Theory In A Post-Cold War World.J. Bryan Hehir - 1992 - Journal of Religious Ethics 20 (2):237-257.
Justifying Coercive and Non-Coercive Intervention: Strategic and Humanitarian Arguments.Rory J. Conces - 2001 - Acta Analytica 16 (27):133-52.
The Human Rights of Others: Sovereignty, Legitimacy, and "Just Causes" for the "War on Terror".Margaret Denike - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (2):pp. 95-121.
A State to Call Their Own: Insurrection, Intervention, and the Communal Integrity Thesis.Ned Dobos - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):26-38.
Terrorism and the Politics of Human Rights.Sharon Anderson-Gold - 2004 - Social Philosophy Today 20:155-164.
Motives, Outcomes, Intent and the Legitimacy of Humanitarian Intervention.Alex J. Bellamy - 2004 - Journal of Military Ethics 3 (3):216-232.
Added to index2011-08-04
Total downloads38 ( #134,682 of 2,163,570 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #188,991 of 2,163,570 )
How can I increase my downloads?