Leavis and Literary Criticism

Philosophy 51 (195):21 - 34 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophers almost by profession are minders of other people's business, that is their intellectual business; which, though a necessary trade, is not always a popular one. So Socrates found long ago. Discretion may therefore seem called for, and still more so in writing of Dr Leavis. Leavis is, so to speak, a hot subject; and not only so in himself, hence to be taken up with caution, but a cause that heat is in other men. Nor is that all; other, harder obstacles remain. It would seem that Leavis explicitly shuts the door on any philosophical approach. Philosophers, broadly speaking, deal in abstractions . Leavis wrote long ago, at the start of Revaluation , ‘No treatment of poetry can be worth much that does not keep very close to the concrete’. That ruling, which might debar my whole enterprise, I can take instead as raising immediately its main theme

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ancient Literary Criticism.Andrew Laird (ed.) - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Literary critics in a new era.Martin Paulsen - 2008 - Studies in East European Thought 60 (3):251 - 260.
The absolutism of F. R. Leavis.Bernard Heyl - 1954 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 13 (2):249-255.
Resurrecting Language through Social Criticism.Sally J. Scholz - 2001 - Social Philosophy Today 17:203-216.
Leavis, literary criticism and philosophy.Peter Byrne - 1979 - British Journal of Aesthetics 19 (3):263-273.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
16 (#880,136)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references