Loptson on Anselm and Davis

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00162670
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,113
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Conceiving as Existent: A Final Rejoinder to Davis. [REVIEW]Peter Loptson - 1986 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 19 (1/2):123 - 125.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

In Defense of Anselm.Mark Owen Webb - 2005 - Philo 8 (1):55-58.
Anselm and Question-Begging: A Reply to William Rowe. [REVIEW]Stephen T. Davis - 1976 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7 (4):448 - 457.
Anselm, Meinong, and the Ontological Argument.Peter J. Loptson - 1980 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (3):185 - 194.
Anselm and Gaunilo on the 'Lost Island'.Stephen T. Davis - 1975 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 13 (4):435-448.
Conceiving as Existent: A Final Rejoinder to Davis. [REVIEW]Peter Loptson - 1986 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 19 (1/2):123 - 125.
Anselm and Rowe: A Reply to Davis. [REVIEW]Peter Loptson - 1984 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 15 (1/2):67 - 71.
Loptson on Anselm and Rowe.Stephen T. Davis - 1982 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (4):219 - 224.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
18 ( #369,077 of 2,313,610 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #392,244 of 2,313,610 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature