AbstractDid Maimonides accept or reject the concept of Natural Law? While initial inquiries asked whether Maimonides accepted or rejected the doctrine as a whole, later studies focussed on whether Maimonidean legal theory could go along with the Natural Law doctrine or not. The aim of my paper is to go a step further and to argue that while Maimonides had a lively interest in the relationship between nature and law, he was not dragged into the Natural Law discourse. In other words, although he didn't overlook the nature-law question in his jurisprudential scheme, he didn't see it as integral to his legal theory.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Plasticity and Perfection: Maimonides and Aristotle on Character.Jonathan Jacobs - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (4):443-454.
The Role of Reason in the Ethics of Maimonides: Or, Why Maimonides Could Have Had a Doctrine of Natural Law Even If He Did Not.Michael P. Levine - 1986 - Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (2):279 - 295.
Narrative, Nature, and the Natural Law: From Aquinas to International Human Rights.C. Fred Alford - 2010 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Natural Law, Religion, and Rights: An Exploration of the Relationship Between Natural Law and Natural Rights, with Special Emphasis on the Teachings of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.Henrik Syse - 2007 - St. Augustine's Press.
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Les Fondements Naturels de la Loi Divine Dans L’Œuvre de Rabbi Josef Albo.Shalom Sadik - 2017 - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 25 (2):196-208.