Studia Logica 72 (3):339-362 (2002)

Kevin Davey
University of Chicago
In this paper, we consider two different ways in which modus-ponens type reasoning with conditional obligations may be formalized. We develop necessary and sufficient conditions for the validity of each, and make some philosophical observations about the differences between the minor premises that each formalization requires. All this is done within the context of the Belnap-Perloff stit theory.
Keywords Philosophy   Logic   Mathematical Logic and Foundations   Computational Linguistics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1021841323244
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,160
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
46 ( #244,281 of 2,499,436 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,166 of 2,499,436 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes