Obligation and the conditional in stit theory

Studia Logica 72 (3):339-362 (2002)
In this paper, we consider two different ways in which modus-ponens type reasoning with conditional obligations may be formalized. We develop necessary and sufficient conditions for the validity of each, and make some philosophical observations about the differences between the minor premises that each formalization requires. All this is done within the context of the Belnap-Perloff stit theory.
Keywords Philosophy   Logic   Mathematical Logic and Foundations   Computational Linguistics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1021841323244
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,756
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

29 ( #178,876 of 2,177,962 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #316,663 of 2,177,962 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums