Philosophical Inclusive Design: Intellectual Disability and the Limits of Individual Autonomy in Moral and Political Theory

Hypatia 30 (1):132-148 (2015)

Abstract
Drawing on the built environment concept of “inclusive design” and its emphasis on creating accessible environments for all persons regardless of ability, I suggest that a central task for feminist disability theory is to redesign foundational philosophical concepts to present opportunities rather than barriers to inclusion for people with disability. Accounts of autonomy within liberal philosophy stress self-determination and the dignity of all individual persons, but have excluded people with intellectual disability from moral and political theories by denying their capacity for individual autonomy, seen as a chief marker of moral personhood. This paper modifies and extends feminist theories of relational autonomy by arguing for the need to view autonomy as a feature of persons that is manifested only through relations of support, advocacy, and enablement. An “inclusively designed,” relational account negotiates the tensions encountered in attempts to apply autonomy to people with high support needs, and politicizes the concept as an advocacy tool for people with intellectual disability and their allies
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/hypa.12119
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,238
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Political Liberalism.Stephen Mulhall - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (177):542-545.
The Theory and Practice of Autonomy.Gerald Dworkin - 1988 - Philosophy 64 (250):571-572.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Feminist Approaches to Cognitive Disability.Licia Carlson - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (10):541-553.
Interspecies Politics: Reply to Hinchcliffe and Ladwig.Sue Donaldson & Will Kymlicka - 2015 - Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (3):321-344.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Individualist Model of Autonomy and the Challenge of Disability.Anita Ho - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (2-3):193-207.
Clement and Sen.Laura E. Weed - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:79-83.
Disability in the Bioethics Curriculum.Anita Ho - 2007 - Teaching Philosophy 30 (4):403-420.
Philosophical and Ethical Issues in Disability.Jeffrey Blustein - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (4):573-587.
Understanding Autonomy in Light of Intellectual Disability.Leslie P. Francis - 2009 - In Kimberley Brownlee & Adam Cureton (eds.), Disability and Disadvantage. Oxford University Press.
Autonomy.Andrew Sneddon - 2013 - Bloomsbury Academic.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-09-24

Total views
39 ( #230,731 of 2,285,777 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #416,003 of 2,285,777 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature