Bioethics 34 (5):459-466 (2020)

Authors
Ben Davies
Oxford University
Abstract
Patients are generally assumed to have the right to choices about treatment, including the right to refuse treatment, which is constrained by considerations of cost‐effectiveness. Independently, many people support the idea that patients who are responsible for their ill health should incur penalties that non‐responsible patients do not face. Surprisingly, these two areas have not received much joint attention. This paper considers whether restricting the scope of responsibility to pre‐treatment decisions can be justified, or whether a demand to hold people responsible for 'usual suspect' choices such as smoking or failure to exercise commits us to also holding people responsible for their treatment choices. I argue that there is no good reason to support this restriction: those who advocate responsibility for (some) pre‐treatment choices should also advocate responsibility for (some) treatment choices. However, I also note that, as with pre‐treatment choices, patients may sometimes have reason to choose in ways that do not optimize their health. As such, I also consider a process, based on the idea of public reasons, for deciding which treatment choices patients cannot legitimately be held responsible for, along with a method for considering proposed changes to this category.
Keywords choice  healthcare  public reasons  responsibility
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/bioe.12693
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Limits on Patient Responsibility.Maureen Kelley - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):189 – 206.
The Virtue of Moral Responsibility and the Obligations of Patients.Candace Cummins Gauthier - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):153 – 166.
The Noncompliant Patient: A Kantian and Levinasian Response.P. Burcher - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):74-89.
The Limits of Rights-Based Discourse.Mary Warnock - 2006 - In John R. Spencer & Antje Du Bois-Pedain (eds.), Freedom and Responsibility in Reproductive Choice. Hart.
Patient Informed Choice for Altruism.M. D. Doukas, David J. & John Hardwig - 2014 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (4):397-402.
Responsibility Without Choice. A First-Person Approach.A. J. C. Freeman - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (10):61-68.
The Function of Art Therapy in Birthing Our Proper Creativity: Creativity-Based Art Therapy Theory.Evadne Mcneil - 1984 - Dissertation, The Union for Experimenting Colleges and Universities

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-11-27

Total views
31 ( #350,818 of 2,448,167 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #227,028 of 2,448,167 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes