Rights, Moral Values and Natural Facts: a reply to Mary Midgley on the problem of child-abuse

Journal of Applied Philosophy 9 (1):99-104 (1992)
Abstract
Mary Midgley asserts that my argument concerning the problem of child-abuse was inappropriately framed in the language of rights, and neglected certain pertinent natural facts. I defend the view that the use of rights-talk was both apposite and did not misrepresent the moral problem in question. I assess the status and character of the natural facts Midgley adduces in criticism of my case, concluding that they do not obviously establish the conclusions she believes they do. Finally I briefly respond to the charge that my suggestions were illiberal
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5930.1992.tb00300.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,694
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Child Abuse: Parental Rights and the Interests of the Child.David Archard - 1990 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (2):183-194.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Biological Parenthood: Gestational Not Genetic.Anca Gheaus - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-16.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2010-08-10

Total downloads
26 ( #202,551 of 2,197,196 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #148,610 of 2,197,196 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature