Rhetoric, technical writing, and ethics

Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):463-478 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many outside science and engineering, especially social scientists and “rhetoricians”, claim that rhetoric, “the art of persuasion”, is an important part of technical communication. This claim is either trivial or false. If “persuasion” simply means “effective communication”, then, of course, rhetoric is an important part of technical communication. But, if “persuasion” has anything like its traditional meaning (a specific art of winning conviction), rhetoric is not an important part of technical communication; indeed, its use in technical communication would be unethical. [By] an advocate is meant one whose business it is to smooth over real difficulties, and to persuade where he cannot convince.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rhetoric and Philosophy.Richard A. Cherwitz (ed.) - 1990 - L. Erlbaum Associates.
Integrating ethics into technical courses: Micro-insertion. [REVIEW]Michael Davis - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4):717-730.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
37 (#317,702)

6 months
2 (#298,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Davis
Illinois Institute of Technology