Journal of Business Ethics 13 (12):979-987 (1994)

Abstract
Extending the work of Davidson and Worrell, we further investigate the stock market''s reaction to announced corporate illegalities. We examine a sample of 535 announcements of corporate crime and obtain an overall insignificant stock market reaction. However, when the sample is divided by type of crime, we find that the stock market reacts significantly to announcements of bribery, tax evasion, and violations of government contracts. We also find a significantly negative reaction to announcements of corporate crime when the company had been previously accused of other illegal activity. For companies accused of crime in the 1970s, 51% of them were accused again in the 1980s
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00881667
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,464
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

In Search of Beneficence.Mark Starik & Archie B. Carroll - 1990 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 1:1-15.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
39 ( #293,220 of 2,520,438 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,438 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes