Separation of conjoined twins and the principle of double effect

Christian Bioethics 12 (3):291-300 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article examines the relationship between the principle of double effect and justification for separation surgeries for conjoined twins. First, the principle of double effect is examined in light of its historical context. It is argued that it can only operate under an absolutist view of good and evil that is compatible with the Bible. Given this foundation for application, scenarios for separating conjoined twins are considered against the criteria for the principle of double effect. It is concluded that the principle of double effect cannot be applied to cases wherein one of the twins must be killed. However, it is noted that this does not leave decision makers without options



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,389

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics: English High Court Orders Separation of Conjoined Twins.Jacob M. Appel - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (3):312-318.
Who is Entitled to Double Effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
Paul Ramsey and the Rule of Double Effect.Sanford S. Levy - 1987 - Journal of Religious Ethics 15 (1):59 - 71.
The Double Life of Double Effect.Allison McIntyre - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1):61-74.


Added to PP

58 (#201,813)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
One of Us: Conjoined Twins and the Future of Normal.Shelley Tremain - 2009 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1):181-184.
Defending Double Effect.Alison Hills - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 116 (2):133-152.

View all 7 references / Add more references