Law and Philosophy 3 (1):61 - 110 (1984)

Authors
Michael Davis
Illinois Institute of Technology
Abstract
The paper is an application of the principle of just deserts (that is, retribution) to the setting of statutory penalties. The conclusion is that there should be no separate penalty for rape but that rape should be punished under the ordinary battery statutes. The argument has four parts. First, there is a description of the place of rape in a typical statutory scheme. Second, there is a consideration of possible justifications for giving rape the status it has in such a typical scheme. All justifications appear to fail for one reason or another. Third, rape is analyzed as battery and the analysis is justified. This analysis includes an explanation of why it would be unjust to punish rape more severely than ordinary batteries. Last, there is a catalogue of some practical advantages to treating rape as battery (for example, simplifying proof of the crime). The paper takes the principle of just deserts (in the form I have elsewhere defended it) for granted, but does add substantially to the understanding of how to apply it.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00211225
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,021
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Wrong of Rape.David Archard - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):374–393.
Rape and Persuasive Definition.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 1995 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):415 - 454.
Rethinking the Presumption of Atheism.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 84 (1):93-111.
Conscience (Rule) Utilitarianism and the Criminal Law.R. B. Brandt - 1995 - Law and Philosophy 14 (1):65 - 89.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
64 ( #161,465 of 2,433,524 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #468,801 of 2,433,524 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes