Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8 (3):687-708 (2017)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The literature on the evolution of religion has been divided by a fundamental debate between adaptation theories, which explain religious traits as products of selection for religion, and byproduct theories, which explain religious traits as products of selection for other, non-religious functions. Recently, however, a new position has emerged in this debate, as an influential new theory based on cultural selection claims to integrate adaptation theories with byproduct theories, yielding a single, unified account. I argue that the proponents of this view do not say enough about how integration is actually supposed to work, from a logical point of view. Basic questions arise from the assumptions required for unifying these apparently conflicting approaches, which the authors of the account do not address. In response to these questions, I provide a model of the religious phenotype, the Goldberg Exaptation Model, which shows that adaptation and byproduct theories are consistent, and explains how they are positively related, over and above mere consistency. On this view, the religious phenotype is best understood on analogy with a Rube Goldberg device: it is assembled by selection for religion, but using parts designed by selection for other, non-religious functions.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s13164-016-0321-4 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Selection Type Theories.Lindley Darden & Joseph A. Cain - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (1):106-129.
Adaptation, Exaptation, By-Products, and Spandrels in Evolutionary Explanations of Morality.Benjamin James Fraser - 2010 - Biological Theory 5 (3):223-227.
Adaptation for, Exaptation As.Nicholas S. Thompson - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):531-532.
Rx: Distinguish Group Selection From Group Adaptation.Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (4):628-629.
George Fox and Some Theories of Innovation in Religion.Claire Disbrey - 1989 - Religious Studies 25 (1):61 - 74.
The Evolution of Religion: Adaptationist Accounts.Michael J. Murray - 2010 - In Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 437--457.
Religious Cognition as Social Cognition.Hans Van Eyghen - 2015 - Studia Religiologica 48 (4):301-312.
Use of Phylogenetic Analysis to Distinguish Adaptation From Exaptation.Daniel G. Blackburn - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):507-508.
It's Adaptations All the Way Down.M. D. Rutherford - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):526-526.
The Evolutionary Structure of Scientific Theories.John S. Wilkins - 1998 - Biology and Philosophy 13 (4):479–504.
Testing Major Evolutionary Hypotheses About Religion with a Random Sample.David Sloan Wilson - 2005 - Human Nature 16 (4):382-409.
Can Neurotheology Explain Religion?Dave Vliegenthart - 2011 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 33 (2):137-171.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2016-10-07
Total views
13 ( #717,006 of 2,411,479 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #346,366 of 2,411,479 )
2016-10-07
Total views
13 ( #717,006 of 2,411,479 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #346,366 of 2,411,479 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads