A bayesian analysis of Hume's argument concerning miracles

Philosophical Quarterly 39 (154):57-65 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,319

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
322 (#74,493)

6 months
20 (#190,836)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Donald Gillies
University College London
Philip Dawid
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

Hume and the Independent Witnesses.Arif Ahmed - 2015 - Mind 124 (496):1013-1044.
Hume on probability.Barry Gower - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (1):1-19.
Miracles, historical testimonies, and probabilities.Aviezer Tucker - 2005 - History and Theory 44 (3):373–390.
David Hume's no-miracles argument begets a valid No-Miracles Argument.Colin Howson - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:41-45.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references