The future of bioethics: Three dogmas and a cup of hemlock

Bioethics 24 (5):218-225 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I argue that bioethics is in crisis and that it will not have a future unless it begins to embrace a more Socratic approach to its leading assumptions. The absence of a critical and sceptical spirit has resulted in little more than a dominant ideology. I focus on three key issues. First, that too often bioethics collapses into medical ethics. Second, that medical ethics itself is beset by a lack of self-reflection that I characterize here as a commitment to three dogmas. Third, I offer a more positive perspective by suggesting how bioethics may benefit from looking towards public health ethics as a new source of inspiration and direction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The future of bioethics.Howard Brody - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Left bias in academic bioethics : three dogmas.Griffin Trotter - 2007 - In Lisa A. Eckenwiler & Felicia Cohn (eds.), The Ethics of Bioethics: Mapping the Moral Landscape. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Judging the future: Whose fault will it be?Daniel Callahan - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (6):677 – 687.
The politics of bioethics.Alan R. Petersen - 2011 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-05-04

Downloads
100 (#174,284)

6 months
8 (#365,731)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references