Putting inference to the best explanation in its place

Synthese 98 (2):271-295 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses the nature and the status of inference to the best explanation. We outline the foundational role given IBE by its defenders and the arguments of critics who deny it any place at all ; argue that, on the two main conceptions of explanation, IBE cannot be a foundational inference rule ; sketch an account of IBE that makes it contextual and dependent on substantive empirical assumptions, much as simplicity seems to be ; show how that account avoids the critics ' complaints and leaves IBE an important role ; and sketch how our account can clarify debates over IBE in arguments for scientific realism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
22 (#733,560)

6 months
384 (#4,888)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1991 - London and New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach.Peter Urbach & Colin Howson - 1993 - Chicago: Open Court. Edited by Peter Urbach.
The Problems of Philosophy.Bertrand Russell - 1912 - Portland, OR: Home University Library.
Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1991 - London and New York: Routledge.

View all 34 references / Add more references