Are Digital Images Allographic?


Authors
P. D. Magnus
State University of New York, Albany
Jason D'Cruz
State University of New York, Albany
Abstract
Nelson Goodman's distinction between autographic and allographic arts is appealing, we suggest, because it promises to resolve several prima facie puzzles. We consider and rebut a recent argument that alleges that digital images explode the autographic/allographic distinction. Regardless, there is another familiar problem with the distinction, especially as Goodman formulates it: it seems to entirely ignore an important sense in which all artworks are historical. We note in reply that some artworks can be considered both as historical products and as formal structures. Talk about such works is ambiguous between the two conceptions. This allows us to recover Goodman's distinction: art forms that are ambiguous in this way are allographic. With that formulation settled, we argue that digital images are allographic. We conclude by considering the objection that digital photographs, unlike other digital images, would count as autographic by our criterion; we reply that this points to the vexed nature of photography rather than any problem with the distinction
Keywords allographic  autographic  digital art  goodman
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/jaac.12117
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why Digital Pictures Are Not Notational Representations.John Zeimbekis - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (4):449-453.
Preserving the Autographic/Allographic Distinction.Jason D'Cruz & P. D. Magnus - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (4):453-457.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Goodman's Autographic/Allographic Distinction.Jesper Ryberg - 1998 - Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 33:71-83.
Nelson Goodman's Autographic-Allographic.Remei Capdevila Werning - 2009 - In G. Ernst, J. Steinbrenner & O. Scholz (eds.), From Logic to Art: Themes From Nelson Goodman. Ontos. pp. 269.
Replicative Forgery.John Zeimbekis - 2004 - Art and Cognition Workshops.
Autographic and Allographic Art Revisited.Jerrold Levinson - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 38 (4):367 - 383.
Identity of the Work of Art.Stefan Ristic - 2010 - Filozofija I Društvo 21 (2):293-308.
Identifying and Reconciling Two Images of “Man”.David Hodgson - 2012 - Humana.Mente - Journal of Philosophical Studies 21.
Cultura y contracultura digital: un ensayo.Jorge Portilla - 2011 - Apuntes Filosóficos 20 (39).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-11-04

Total views
123 ( #55,118 of 2,319,701 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
87 ( #4,684 of 2,319,701 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature