Rationalization, Evidence, and Pretense

Ratio 28 (3):318-331 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I distinguish the category of “rationalization” from various forms of epistemic irrationality. I maintain that only if we model rationalizers as pretenders can we make sense of the rationalizer's distinctive relationship to the evidence in her possession. I contrast the cognitive attitude of the rationalizer with that of believers whose relationship to the evidence I describe as “waffling” or “intransigent”. In the final section of the paper, I compare the rationalizer to the Frankfurtian bullshitter

Similar books and articles

Rationalization as performative pretense.Jason D'Cruz - 2015 - Philosophical Psychology 28 (7):980-1000.
Noninstrumental rationalizing.Alfred R. Mele - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (3):236–250.
Disagreement, equal weight and commutativity.Alastair Wilson - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 149 (3):321 - 326.
A discourse on Forestry science.Laurent Umans - 1993 - Agriculture and Human Values 10 (4):26-40.
Ex ante vs. Ex post Rationalization of Action.Yujian Zheng - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 9:137-142.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-08-28

Downloads
576 (#29,612)

6 months
100 (#39,223)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jason D'Cruz
State University of New York, Albany

References found in this work

Doxastic deliberation.Nishi Shah & J. David Velleman - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (4):497-534.
Self-Deception Unmasked.Alfred R. Mele - 2001 - Princeton University Press.

View all 30 references / Add more references