Marcelo Araujo
Rio de Janeiro State University
The use of equally compelling arguments both for andagainst the truth of a proposition were known in the Renaissance asarguments in utramque partem. Early modern sceptics used argumentsin utramque partem in order to show that one cannot ground moralityon safe grounds, for the arguments which are presented in favor of theidea of justice could be neutralized by equally compelling argumentsagainst the idea of justice. In this paper, I argue that Hugo Grotiustried to refute this kind of moral scepticism in his main philosophical writings, De jure bellic ac pacis and De jure praedae commentarius.Against the sceptic, Grotius seeks to establish that the reasons whichare consecutively presented for and against the idea of justice are notincompatible with each other.O uso de argumentos igualmente convincentes tanto emprol quanto contra a veracidade de uma proposição era conhecido naRenascença como in utramque partem. Céticos do início da Modernidadeutilizaram argumentos in utramque partem visando demonstrar que nãose pode fundamentar a moralidade em um terreno sólido, já que osargumentos apresentados em favor da ideia de Justiça poderiam serneutralizados por argumentos igualmente convincentes contra a ideiade Justiça. Nesse artigo, eu argumento que Hugo Grotius tentou refutaresse tipo de ceticismo moral em seus principais escritos filosóficos, Dejure bellic ac pacis e De jure praedae commentarius. Contra os céticos,Grotius procura estabelecer que as razões apresentadas a favor e contraa ideia de Justiça não são incompatíveis entre si.
Keywords Hugo Grotius. Moral. Scepticism. Justice.  Hugo Grotius. Moral. Ceticismo. Justiça
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,740
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Grotius, Carneades and Hobbes.Richard Tuck - 1983 - Grotiana 4 (1):43-62.
Grotius and Hobbes.Martin Harvey - 2006 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (1):27 – 50.
Grotius and the Skeptics.Thomas Mautner - 2005 - Journal of the History of Ideas 66 (4):577-601.
Carneades at Rome: A Problem of Sceptical Rhetoric.K. E. Wilkerson - 1988 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 21 (2):131 - 144.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hugo Grotius, Moral Scepticism and the Use of Arguments in Utramque Partem.Hugo Grotius - 2011 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 56 (3):145-166.
Grotius and Aristotle: The Justice of Taking Too Little.Andrew Blom - 2016 - History of Political Thought 36 (1):84-112.
Grotius, Hugo.Andrew Blom - 2014 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Hugo Grotius E As Relações Internacionais: Entre O Direito E A Guerra.Gabriel Barnabe - 2009 - Cadernos de Ética E Filosofia Política 15:27-47.
Hugo Grotius de Veritate Religionis Christianæ.Hugo Grotius & Sébastien Cramoisy - 1640 - Sumptibus Seb. Cramoisy, Typographi Regij.


Added to PP index

Total views
25 ( #444,002 of 2,462,878 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,363 of 2,462,878 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes