On Urbach's analysis of the 'iq debate'

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (1):60-65 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/37.1.60

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On Urbach's analysis of the ‘iq debate’.Michael A. B. Deakin - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (1):60-65.
A reply to Mayo's criticisms of Urbach's "randomization and the design of experiments".Peter Urbach - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (1):125-128.
Progress and degeneration in the 'IQ debate' (I).Peter Urbach - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (2):99-135.
Progress and degeneration in the 'IQ debate' (II).Peter Urbach - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):235-259.
Reply to Hitchcock.Peter Urbach - 1992 - Analysis 52 (2):65 - 68.
Urbach on the Laws of Nature.Christopher Hitchcock - 1992 - Analysis 52 (2):61 - 64.
Regression analysis: Classical and bayesian.Peter Urbach - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (3):311-342.
Comments on "randomization and the design of experiments" by P. Urbach.O. Mayo - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (4):592-596.
On the meaning and function of normative analysis: Conceptual blur in the rationality debate?David R. Mandel - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):686-687.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
260 (#74,690)

6 months
4 (#797,377)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references