Skow on Robust Passage and The Moving Spotlight Theory

Philosophical Studies 175 (7):1791-1805 (2018)
Abstract
Bradford Skow’s Objective Becoming (2015) is a strikingly original and philosophically rich contribution to contemporary philosophy of time. The book rewards very careful study, and is surely a ‘must-read’ for anyone with an interest in current debates concerning time and change. Perhaps the most immediately compelling aspect of the book is its leading question: if I [Skow] didn’t already accept the ‘block universe theory’ (BU),1 which theory of time would I defend? Skow’s surprising (and, from my perspective, welcome!) answer is that he would defend some version of the Moving Spotlight Theory (MST). However, Skow’s reason for this answer is less familiar: it is that MST—unlike BU and its popular rival Presentism—‘contains robust passage’. Skow goes on to (quite convincingly, in my view) defend two versions of MST against a number of common objections: ‘MST-Supertense’ and ‘MST-Time’. In the first part of this paper (§1), I investigate the question of what it is for a theory to contain robust passage in Skow’s sense. In particular, I argue that given Skow’s arguments in favour of robust passage, he should probably not count MST-Time as a theory that contains robust passage. I also argue that there are better reasons to reject BU than those Skow describes. In the second part of the paper (§2), I focus on Skow’s MST-Supertense. I argue that there are reasons for MSTers to reject MST-Supertense in favour of a more ‘traditional’ version of MST (the view I call ‘Classic MST’).
Keywords Metaphysics  Time  Moving Spotlight Theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-018-1092-9
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,696
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Moving Spotlight Theory.Daniel Deasy - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (8):2073-2089.
A Defense of Presentism.Ned Markosian - 2004 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 1 (3):47-82.
Four Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time.Theodore Sider - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):642-647.
Presentism and the Space-Time Manifold.Dean Zimmerman - 2011 - In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press. pp. 163--246.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Objective Becoming.Bradford Skow - 2015 - Oxford University Press UK.
Skow on the Passage of Time.Alastair Wilson - 2018 - Analysis 78 (1):117-128.
Reply to Miller, Sider and Skow.Ross P. Cameron - 2017 - Analysis 77 (4):810-824.
Relativity and the Moving Spotlight.Bradford Skow - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy 106 (12):666-678.
The Moving Spotlight Theory.Daniel Deasy - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (8):2073-2089.
Why Does Time Pass?Bradford Skow - 2012 - Noûs 46 (2):223-242.
On the Meaning of the Question “How Fast Does Time Pass?”.Brad Skow - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (3):325-344.
The Moving Spotlight: An Essay on Time and Ontology.Elena Fell - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (271):411-413.
Added to PP index
2018-04-18

Total downloads
21 ( #273,595 of 2,237,293 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #21,735 of 2,237,293 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature