University of Chicago Press (2006)
Throughout the history of the Western world, science has possessed an extraordinary amount of authority and prestige. And while its pedestal has been jostled by numerous evolutions and revolutions, science has always managed to maintain its stronghold as the knowing enterprise that explains how the natural world works: we treat such legendary scientists as Galileo, Newton, Darwin, and Einstein with admiration and reverence because they offer profound and sustaining insight into the meaning of the universe. In The Intelligibility of Nature , Peter Dear considers how science as such has evolved and how it has marshaled itself to make sense of the world. His intellectual journey begins with a crucial observation: that the enterprise of science is, and has been, directed toward two distinct but frequently conflated ends—doing and knowing. The ancient Greeks developed this distinction of value between craft on the one hand and understanding on the other, and according to Dear, that distinction has survived to shape attitudes toward science ever since. Teasing out this tension between doing and knowing during key episodes in the history of science—mechanical philosophy and Newtonian gravitation, elective affinities and the chemical revolution, enlightened natural history and taxonomy, evolutionary biology, the dynamical theory of electromagnetism, and quantum theory—Dear reveals how the two principles became formalized into a single enterprise, science, that would be carried out by a new kind of person, the scientist. Finely nuanced and elegantly conceived, The Intelligibility of Nature will be essential reading for aficionados and historians of science alike.
|Keywords||Science History Science History Reasoning History Philosophy of nature History|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$3.99 used (77% off) $9.95 new (42% off) $17.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||Q175.32.R45.D43 2006|
|ISBN(s)||0226139492 0226139484 9780226139487 0226139506 9780226139500|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Beyond Structural Realism: Pluralist Criteria for Theory Evaluation.Mark Newman - 2010 - Synthese 174 (3):413-443.
The No-Miracles Argument, Reliabilism, and a Methodological Version of the Generality Problem.Mark Newman - 2010 - Synthese 177 (1):111 - 138.
Two Styles of Reasoning in Scientific Practices: Experimental and Mathematical Traditions.Mieke Boon - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):255 - 278.
Connecting Information with Scientific Method: Darwin's Significance for Epistemology. [REVIEW]Matthias Kuhle & Sabine Kuhle - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (2):333 - 357.
Similar books and articles
Rational Reconstructions Revised.Peter Machamer & Franccsca Di Poppa - 2001 - Theoria 16 (3):461-480.
The Intelligibility of Nature: How Science Makes Sense of the World. By Peter Dear.Louis Caruana - 2008 - Heythrop Journal 49 (4):702–703.
As Regards the Humanities--: An Approach to Their Theory Through History and Philosophy.Jens Høyrup - 1995 - Max Planck Institute for the History of Science.
A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy.John F. W. Herschel - 1830 - University of Chicago Press.
Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science.Michael R. Matthews - 1994 - Routledge.
Goethe's Way of Science: A Phenomenology of Nature.David Seamon & Arthur Zajonc (eds.) - 1998 - State University of New York Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads49 ( #103,564 of 2,152,002 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #185,176 of 2,152,002 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.