The San Francisco earthquake of 1906

Annals of Science 50 (6):501-521 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Though among the most famous earthquakes in modern times, San Francisco has almost always been presented as nothing more than a great human disaster. While certainly that, we should regard it also as having had unusual significance in the development of seismology. Because the full extent of the San Andreas fault was thereafter recognized, and the association between faulting and earthquakes confirmed, we may consider the San Francisco earthquake of 1906 to be the first in which modern understanding of seismic causality prevailed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Photography and the Usa.Mick Gidley - 2010 - Reaktion Books.
Thank God for Evil?Freya Mora - 1983 - Philosophy 58 (225):399 - 401.
Teilhard de Chardin: in quest of the perfection of man.Geraldine O. Browning, Joseph L. Alioto & Seymour M. Farber (eds.) - 1973 - Rutherford [N.J.]: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
Announcements.[author unknown] - 1979 - Review of Metaphysics 33 (1):262-268.
Announcements.[author unknown] - 1979 - Review of Metaphysics 33 (1):262-268.
The discovery and development of dolphin-assisted therapy.B. Smith - forthcoming - Between Species: Celebrating the Dolphin-Human Bond. Sierra Club Books, San Francisco.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
42 (#390,004)

6 months
11 (#272,549)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Robert Mallet and the founding of seismology.Dennis R. Dean - 1991 - Annals of Science 48 (1):39-67.

Add more references