Hypatia 30 (1):66-81 (2015)

Tracy R.W. De Boer
University of Victoria
Many disabled people face some form of exclusion or discrimination. One of the most damaging, yet pervasive, types of exclusion is sexual exclusion. Various factors hinder sexual opportunities for disabled persons, such as social attitudes around body image, gender, and sexuality. In this paper, I engage with Sheila Jeffreys's paper, “ Disability and the Male Sex Right,” wherein she argues that discourse around sexual rights for disabled people is a veiled way of promoting male dominance over women. Though Jeffreys raises many pertinent issues, she assumes that when a disabled man seeks commercial sex, he does so as an act of domination or violence. I argue that when a disabled man seeks commercial sex, he is seeking the goods of sex, such as connection, intimacy, and pleasure
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/hypa.12118
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,548
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Sexual Contract.Carole Pateman - 1990 - Ethics 100 (3):658-669.
The Sexual Contract.Carol Pateman - 1988 - Polity Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Sexual Rights Puzzle: Re-Solved?Ezio Di Nucci - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (5):337-338.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sexual Rights and Disability.Ezio Di Nucci - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (3):158-161.
Sex Rights for the Disabled?Jacob M. Appel - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (3):152-154.


Added to PP index

Total views
37 ( #263,093 of 2,348,314 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #329,111 of 2,348,314 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes