Hegel's conception of immanent critique : its sources, extent, and limit

In Ruth Sonderegger & Karin de Boer (eds.), Conceptions of Critique in Modern and Contemporary Philosophy. Palgrave-Macmillan (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This chapter examines Hegel’s conception of philosophical critique in order to shed light on the force and limits of the method that has become known as immanent critique. At least in modern philosophy, it was Kant who first conceived of critique as a form of reflection that draws its criterion from reason itself. As I argue, Hegel is deeply indebted to Kant in this respect. The chapter begins with an analysis of Hegel's seminal essay ‘On the Essence of Philosophical Criticism Generally, and its Relationship to the Present State of Philosophy in Particular’, published in 1802. After a brief discussion of the Phenomenology, I turn to his Philosophy of Right. These texts make clear, I argue, that the criterion from which immanent critique takes its bearings is necessarily tainted with a particularity that it cannot affirm without losing its force. According to this account, immanent critique comes to refer to a form of reflection that is more complicated and more precarious than Kant and Hegel seem to have assumed.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hegel's Immanent Critique.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1978 - Modern Schoolman 55 (3):281-287.
Hegel’s Critique of Kant.Robert R. Williams - 2006 - The Owl of Minerva 38 (1-2):9-34.
Hegel, Marx, and the concept of immanent critique.Andrew Buchwalter - 1991 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (2):253-279.
The eternal irony of the community: Aristophanian echoes in Hegel's phenomenology of spirit.Karin De Boer - 2009 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 52 (4):311 – 334.
Critical reasoning, understanding and self-knowledge.Jessica Brown - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (3):659-676.
So we need something else for reason to mean.Nikolas Kompridis - 2000 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 8 (3):271 – 295.
The critique of pure modernity: Hegel, Heidegger, and after.David Kolb - 1986 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.


Added to PP

384 (#49,717)

6 months
199 (#12,623)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references