La pena di morte alla luce del diritto naturale secondo san tommaso

Gregorianum 88 (1):120-141 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author, with the reflection of St. Thomas as his point of departure, retrieves the central concepts of law and of nature, and with these develops a critique of modern presentations of law and of the State. In particular, relying on relationship as constitutive of human experience, he arrives at a radical critique of any concept that attributes to the State the founding role of juridical experience. In this way, overturning the thought expressed by St. Thomas, he develops implicit presuppositions from it and so arrives at the total rejection of any juridical legitimation of the death penalty as the most complete expression of the effort to «remove a righ t to have rights»

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Giusto secondo natura ed interpretazione delle leggi. Sul diritto naturale in Eric Weil.Gp Calabro - 1986 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia Del Diritto 63 (3):319-349.
L'amoralità del diritto di fronte alla dottrina di san Tommaso.G. Graneris - 1940 - Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 32 (2):138-149.
Per una definizione del diritto naturale.L. Gianformaggio - 1987 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia Del Diritto 64 (1):52-57.
Il diritto naturale nel pensiero di HLA Hart.Mario A. Cattaneo - 1965 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia Del Diritto 42:673.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-30

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references