Issues in Science and Theology: Nature – and Beyond (2020)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This paper examines the role of awe and wonder in scientific practice.
Drawing on evidence from psychological research and the writings of scientists and science communicators, I argue that awe and wonder play a crucial role in scientific discovery. They focus our attention on the natural world, encourage open-mindedness, diminish the self (particularly feelings of self-importance), help to accord value to the objects that are being studied, and provide a mode of understanding in the absence of full knowledge. I will flesh out implications of the role of awe and wonder in scientific discovery for debates on the relationship between science and religion. Abraham Heschel argued that awe and wonder are religious emotions because they reduce our feelings of self-importance, and thereby help to cultivate the proper reverent attitude towards God. Yet metaphysical naturalists such as Richard Dawkins insist that awe and wonder need not lead to any theistic commitments for scientists. The awe some scientists experience can be regarded as a form of non-theistic spirituality, which is neither a reductive naturalism nor theism. I will attempt to resolve the tension between these views by identifying some common ground.
|
Keywords | Awe Wonder Epistemic emotions Non-theistic spirituality |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
God, Design, and Naturalism: Implications of Methodological Naturalism in Science for Science–Religion Relation.Piotr Bylica & Dariusz Sagan - 2008 - Pensamiento 64 (242):621-38.
The Uniformity of Natural Laws in Victorian Britain: Naturalism, Theism, and Scientific Practice.Matthew Stanley - 2011 - Zygon 46 (3):536-560.
Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, & Naturalism.Alvin Plantinga - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Cognitive Science of Religion and Theism: How Can They Be Compatible?Leo Näreaho - 2014 - Religious Studies 50 (1):51-66.
Horizon for Scientific Practice: Scientific Discovery and Progress.James A. Marcum - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):187-215.
Subjectivity and Emotion in Scientific Research.Jeff Kochan - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):354-362.
Spirituality in Psychology of Religion: A Concept in Search of Its Meaning.Herman Westerink - 2012 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 34 (1):3-15.
Science, Religion, and Naturalism: Metaphysical and Methodological Incompatibilities.Marin Mahner - 2014 - In Michael R. Matthews (ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer. pp. 1793-1835.
Gender, Emotions, and Epistemic Values in High-Energy Physics: A Feminist Challenge for Scientific Methodology.Kristina Helena Rolin - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Minnesota
Spirituality, Expertise, and Philosophers.Bryan Frances - 2008 - In Jon Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press. pp. 44-81.
Epistemic Dependence and Collective Scientific Knowledge.Jeroen de Ridder - 2014 - Synthese 191 (1):1-17.
Whose Science and Whose Religion? Reflections on the Relations Between Scientific and Religious Worldviews.Stuart Glennan - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (6-7):797-812.
Facing the Incompleteness of Epistemic Trust: Managing Dependence in Scientific Practice.Susann Wagenknecht - 2015 - Social Epistemology 29 (2):160-184.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-03-06
Total views
139 ( #68,597 of 2,403,075 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
68 ( #10,437 of 2,403,075 )
2020-03-06
Total views
139 ( #68,597 of 2,403,075 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
68 ( #10,437 of 2,403,075 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads