MIT Press (2015)
[from the publisher's website] Questions about the existence and attributes of God form the subject matter of natural theology, which seeks to gain knowledge of the divine by relying on reason and experience of the world. Arguments in natural theology rely largely on intuitions and inferences that seem natural to us, occurring spontaneously—at the sight of a beautiful landscape, perhaps, or in wonderment at the complexity of the cosmos—even to a nonphilosopher. In this book, Helen De Cruz and Johan De Smedt examine the cognitive origins of arguments in natural theology. They find that although natural theological arguments can be very sophisticated, they are rooted in everyday intuitions about purpose, causation, agency, and morality. Using evidence and theories from disciplines including the cognitive science of religion, evolutionary ethics, evolutionary aesthetics, and the cognitive science of testimony, they show that these intuitions emerge early in development and are a stable part of human cognition. -/- De Cruz and De Smedt analyze the cognitive underpinnings of five well-known arguments for the existence of God: the argument from design, the cosmological argument, the moral argument, the argument from beauty, and the argument from miracles. Finally, they consider whether the cognitive origins of these natural theological arguments should affect their rationality.
|Keywords||natural theology cognitive science of religion arguments for the existence of God philosophy of religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Where Philosophical Intuitions Come From.Helen De Cruz - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (2):233-249.
The Relevance of Hume's Natural History of Religion for Cognitive Science of Religion.Helen De Cruz - 2015 - Res Philosophica 92 (3):653-674.
Why the Cognitive Science of Religion Cannot Rescue ‘Spiritual Care’.John Paley - 2015 - Nursing Philosophy 16 (4):213-225.
Religious Belief is Not Natural. Why Cognitive Science of Religion Does Not Show That Religious Belief is Rational.Hans Van Eyghen - 2016 - Studia Humana 5:34-44.
Similar books and articles
The Enduring Appeal of Natural Theological Arguments.Helen De Cruz - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (2):145-153.
Paley's Ipod: The Cognitive Basis of the Design Argument Within Natural Theology.Helen de Cruz & Johan de Smedt - 2010 - Zygon 45 (3):665-684.
Natural Theology, Its “Dwindling Probabilities” and “Lack of Rapport”.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - Faith and Philosophy 21 (4):533 - 546.
Religion is Easy, but Science is Hard … Understanding McCauley's Thesis.James A. Van Slyke - 2014 - Zygon 49 (3):696-707.
God and Greek Philosophy: Studies in the Early History of Natural Theology.Lloyd P. Gerson - 1990 - Routledge.
On McCauley's Why Religion is Natural and Science is Not: Some Further Observations.Gregory R. Peterson - 2014 - Zygon 49 (3):716-727.
Marvels, Miracles, and Mundane Order.S. Buckle - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (1):1 – 31.
Revisiting the ‘Reformed Objection’ to Natural Theology.Michael Sudduth - 2009 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (2):37-62.
Turning Points in Natural Theology From Bacon to Darwin: The Way of the Argument From Design.Stuart Peterfreund - 2012 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Natural Theology and the Uses of Argument.John M. DePoe & Timothy J. McGrew - 2013 - Philosophia Christi 15 (2):299-309.
Principle Writings on Religion, Including Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and the Natural History of Religion.David Hume - 1998 - Oxford University Press.
Divine Law and Human Law in Hobbes's Leviathan.Greg Forster - 2003 - History of Political Thought 24 (2):189-217.
Reenchantment Without Supernaturalism: A Process Philosophy of Religion.David Ray Griffin - 2001 - Cornell University Press.
Added to index2014-11-02
Total downloads204 ( #19,675 of 2,164,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)29 ( #11,196 of 2,164,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?