Body matters: rethinking the ethical acceptability of non-beneficial clinical research with children

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (3):421-431 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The involvement of children in non-beneficial clinical research is extremely important for improving pediatric care, but its ethical acceptability is still disputed. Therefore, various pro-research justifications have been proposed throughout the years. The present essay aims at contributing to the on-going discussion surrounding children’s participation in non-beneficial clinical research. Building on Wendler’s ‘contribution to a valuable project’ justification, but going beyond a risk/benefit analysis, it articulates a pro-research argument which appeals to a phenomenological view on the body and vulnerability. It is claimed that children’s bodies are not mere physical objects, but body-subjects due to which children, as persons, can contribute to research that may hold no direct clinical benefit to them even before they can give informed consent.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,101

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Safeguarding children in clinical research.S. D. Edwards - 2012 - Nursing Ethics 19 (4):530-537.


Added to PP

17 (#640,597)

6 months
1 (#447,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Oneself as Another.Paul Ricoeur - 1992 - University of Chicago Press.
The Absent Body.Drew Leder - 1990 - University of Chicago Press.
Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics.Onora O'Neill - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 45 references / Add more references