Is God an Aspect?

Frontiers of Philosophy in China 7 (2):284-303 (2012)

Authors
Abstract
Neither logical deduction nor empirical induction is capable of mediating the dispute between religious disciples and non-disciples. The case is particularly acute when it comes to the divine Reality (God). Within Wittgenstein’s theoretical framework, some scholars start from the perspective of language games, contending that this dispute is meaningless and should be abandoned, while others are not satisfied with such a settlement and extend Wittgenstein’s aspect theory to religious issues, arguing that God is an aspect. The extension includes analogous and theoretical extensions. This article will show that even if these two extensions are successful, their interpretations with regard to the disputes between religious disciples and non-disciples are not convincing. Worse still, the extension from aspect theory to religious issues is by no means successful in proving that God is an aspect.
Keywords religious reality   religious defense   religious doubt   aspect   seeing-as   religious pluralism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Seeing and Knowing.L. C. Holborow - 1969 - Philosophical Quarterly 21 (82):82-83.
On Conflicting Religious Truth–Claims.John Hick - 1983 - Religious Studies 19 (4):485-491.
Religious Beliefs and Aspect Seeing.N. K. Verbin - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (1):1-23.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Religious Beliefs and Aspect Seeing.N. K. Verbin - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (1):1-23.
Religious Disagreement: Internal and External. [REVIEW]Dennis Potter - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):21-31.
Religious Naturalism and its Rivals.Mikael Stenmark - 2013 - Religious Studies 49 (4):529-550.
Theorizing Religious Diversity in a Multicultural World.Victoria S. Harrison - 2007 - ICFAI Journal of History and Culture 1 (1):25-43.
The Politics of Religious Pluralism.Merold Westphal - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:1-8.
Defending Religious Pluralism for Religious Education.Andrew Davis - 2010 - Ethics and Education 5 (3):189 - 202.
Religious Ambiguity in Hick’s Religious Pluralism.Amir Dastmalchian - 2009 - International Journal of Hekmat 1:75-89.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
119 ( #71,800 of 2,289,311 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #75,551 of 2,289,311 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature