Teaching Philosophy 33 (2):133-142 (2010)
A course in symbolic logic belongs as a requirement in the undergraduate philosophy major. In this paper, which started life as a letter to my departmental colleagues, I consider and respond to several reasons one might have for excluding Logic from the core requirements. I then give several arguments in favor of keeping Logic. The central—and most important—argument is that the lack of a proper background in logic makes it very difficult to approach many relatively straightforward philosophical arguments, let alone the more technical subliteratures of philosophy. In developing this argument, I consider a few core texts and arguments (e.g., Gettier’s classic paper on the analysis of knowledge) and bring out how a student with some background in formal logic would be able to approach the texts and arguments with much greater ease than a student who lacks such a background.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Natural History of the Understanding: Locke and the Rise of Facultative Logic in the Eighteenth Century.James G. Buickerood - 1985 - History and Philosophy of Logic 6 (1):157-190.
The Arabico-Islamic Background of Al-Fārābī's Logic.Sadik Türker - 2007 - History and Philosophy of Logic 28 (3):183-255.
Teaching the Practical Relevance of Propositional Logic.Marvin J. Croy - 2010 - Teaching Philosophy 33 (3):253-270.
Barcan Formulas in Second-Order Modal Logic.Timothy Williamson - 2015 - In Michael Frauchiger (ed.), Themes From Barcan Marcus. Ontos Verlag. pp. 51-74.
Mechanizing Logic I, Map Logic Extended Formally to Relational Arguments & Mechanizing Logic Ii, Automated Map Logic Method for Relational Arguments on Paper and by Computer.John S. Rybak - 1983 - J. & J. Rybak.
Added to index2011-10-15
Total downloads45 ( #112,666 of 2,152,648 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #66,724 of 2,152,648 )
How can I increase my downloads?