Phronesis as Ethical Expertise: Naturalism of Second Nature and the Unity of Virtue

Journal of Value Inquiry 52 (3):287-305 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper has a twofold aim. On the one hand, we will discuss the much debated question of the source of normativity (which traditionally has nature and practical reason as the two main contenders to this role) and propose a new answer to it. Second, in answering this question, we will present a new account of practical wisdom, which conceives of the ethical virtues as ultimately unified in the chief virtue of phronesis, understood as ethical expertise. To do so, we will first criticize the main current view of phronesis and its bearer (the phronimos), then offer another view of the nature of phronesis and of its relation to the other ethical virtues. Our proposal should not be intended as an interpretation of Aristotle’s own view; rather, it should be seen as a broadly Aristotelian theoretical proposal, which we believe can satisfyingly address most of the problems that afflict the more traditional accounts of practical wisdom. In section 2 of this paper, after criticizing first-nature naturalistic views of moral virtue, we take practical reason to be the cornerstone of second-nature naturalistic views; in section 3, we will outline criticisms to which, in our view, the traditional views of phronesis are ill-suited to respond, and, in section 4, we will outline our view of phronesis as ethical expertise – a view which in our view is immune to the above-mentioned criticisms – by spelling out the three main tenets of phronesis as ethical expertise: a conceptual thesis, an epistemic thesis, and the educational implications of the two. Finally, we will support our proposal with some empirical evidence taken from cognitive science.

Similar books and articles

Pre-Reflective Ethical Know-How.Nigel DeSouza - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):279-294.
To What Extent Must We Go Beyond Neo-Aristotelian Ethical Naturalism?David McPherson - 2012 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):627-654.
New Directions in Ethics: Naturalisms, Reasons and Virtue. [REVIEW]Soran Reader - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (4):341-364.
The Possibility of Ethical Expertise.Bruce D. Weinstein - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (1):1-187.
The Phronesis of the Stoic Sage.Danielle Lories - 1999 - Areté. Revista de Filosofía 11 (1):219-244.
Concerned with Oneself as One Person: Self-Knowledge in Phronesis.Jerome Veith - 2013 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (1):17-27.
Speaking of Ethical Expertise . .Giles R. Scofield - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (4):pp. 369-384.
Introduction - the Nature of Naturalism.David Macarthur & Mario De Caro - 2004 - In Mario De Caro & David Macarthur (eds.), Naturalism in Question. Harvard University Press. pp. 1-20.
Modesty Without Illusion.Jason Brennan - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (1):111-128.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-23

Downloads
279 (#41,779)

6 months
55 (#17,926)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Maria Silvia Vaccarezza
Università degli Studi di Genova

References found in this work

Radical Interpretation.Donald Davidson - 1973 - Dialectica 27 (1):314-328.
Exemplarist Virtue Theory.Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (1-2):41-57.
Overcoming the Myth of the Mental: How Philosophers Can Profit From the Phenomenology of Everyday Expertise.Hubert L. Dreyfus - 2005 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 79 (2):47 - 65.
Radical Interpretation.Donald Davidson - 2003 - In John Heil (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.

View all 15 references / Add more references