Participation in 'big style': first observations at the German citizens' dialogue on future technologies [Book Review]
Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):81-99 (2012)
| Abstract |
In 2010, the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research started a series of citizens’ dialogues on future technologies. In the context of the German history of public participation in technology-oriented policy making, these dialogues are unique for at least two reasons: The Federal Ministry retains the responsibility for the entire process and is heavily involved in its planning, organization and communication, and the number of participants and process elements is significantly higher than in most other participative events. The paper presents insights into the political background of the citizens’ dialogues, its general concept as well as first observations from the dialogue rounds on energy and high-tech medicine. In addition, it discusses reactions of other political actors and expectations regarding legitimacy and representativeness of the dialogue results
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
| ISBN(s) | |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10202-012-0119-0 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies.Michael Gibbons (ed.) - 1994 - Sage Publications.
Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Liberals, Critics, Contestations (G. Brock).John S. Dryzek - 2000 - Philosophical Books 43 (2):165-166.
Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations.John Dryzek - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (207):276-279.
View all 15 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Insincere Deliberation and Democratic Failure.Timur Kuran - 1998 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 12 (4):529-544.
Democracy, Citizenship and the Bits in Between.Sarah Fine - 2014 - In Richard Bellamy & Madeleine Kennedy-Macfoy (eds.), Citizenship. Routledge. pp. 623-640.
Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and De-Scribing Publics in Public Engagement.Ulrike Felt & Maximilian Fochler - 2010 - Minerva 48 (3):219-238.
Fighting in the Legal Grey Area: An Analysis of the German Federal Court of Justice Decision in Case Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis.Susanne Benöhr-Laqueur - 2011 - Poiesis and Praxis 8 (1):3-8.
Assessing Project Approval Procedures as Formalised Forms of Public Participation.Michael Zschiesche - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):145-156.
When Should There Be Which Kind of Technology Assessment? A Plea for a Strictly Problem-Oriented Approach From the Very Outset.Michael Decker & Torsten Fleischer - 2010 - Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):117-133.
Participation as a Means of Enhancing the Legitimacy of Decisions on Technology? A Sceptical Analysis.Armin Grunwald - 2004 - Poiesis and Praxis 3 (s 1-2):106-122.
Forward-Looking Activities: Incorporating Citizens' Visions.Niklas Gudowsky, Walter Peissl, Mahshid Sotoudeh & Ulrike Bechtold - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):101-123.
Policy Design for Human Embryo Research in Canada: An Analysis (Part 2 of 2). [REVIEW]Françoise Baylis & Matthew Herder - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):351-365.
Technologies of Democracy: Experiments and Demonstrations.Brice Laurent - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):649-666.
Participation: The Right of Rights.Jeremy Waldron - 1998 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (3):307–337.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2012-11-16
Total views
22 ( #515,582 of 2,518,718 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,070 of 2,518,718 )
2012-11-16
Total views
22 ( #515,582 of 2,518,718 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,070 of 2,518,718 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
