Reformed and evolutionary epistemology and the noetic effects of sin

Abstract
Despite their divergent metaphysical assumptions, Reformed and evolutionary epistemologists have converged on the notion of proper basicality. Where Reformed epistemologists appeal to God, who has designed the mind in such a way that it successfully aims at the truth, evolutionary epistemologists appeal to natural selection as a mechanism that favors truth-preserving cognitive capacities. This paper investigates whether Reformed and evolutionary epistemological accounts of theistic belief are compatible. We will argue that their chief incompatibility lies in the noetic effects of sin and what may be termed the noetic effects of evolution, systematic tendencies wherein human cognitive faculties go awry. We propose a reconceptualization of the noetic effects of sin to mitigate this tension
Keywords Reformed epistemology  Cognitive science of religion  Noetic effects of sin  Evolutionary epistemology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11153-012-9368-z
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Warrant and Proper Function.Alvin Plantinga - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
The Existence of God.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Basic Knowledge and the Problem of Easy Knowledge.Stewart Cohen - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2):309-329.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-08-25

Total downloads

340 ( #7,924 of 2,153,584 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

17 ( #25,737 of 2,153,584 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums