Biology and Philosophy 22 (3):351-368 (2007)
Psychological evidence suggests that laypeople understand the world around them in terms of intuitive ontologies which describe broad categories of objects in the world, such as ‘person’, ‘artefact’ and ‘animal’. However, because intuitive ontologies are the result of natural selection, they only need to be adaptive; this does not guarantee that the knowledge they provide is a genuine reflection of causal mechanisms in the world. As a result, science has parted ways with intuitive ontologies. Nevertheless, since the brain is evolved to understand objects in the world according to these categories, we can expect that they continue to play a role in scientific understanding. Taking the case of human evolution, we explore relationships between intuitive ontological and scientific understanding. We show that intuitive ontologies not only shape intuitions on human evolution, but also guide the direction and topics of interest in its research programmes. Elucidating the relationships between intuitive ontologies and science may help us gain a clearer insight into scientific understanding.
|Keywords||Philosophy Evolutionary Biology Philosophy of Biology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Chimpanzee Minds: Suspiciously Human?Daniel J. Povinelli & Jennifer Vonk - 2003 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (4):157-160.
Insides and Essences: Early Understandings of the Non-Obvious.Susan A. Gelman & Henry M. Wellman - 1991 - Cognition 38 (3):213-244.
Folk Biology and the Anthropology of Science: Cognitive Universals and Cultural Particulars.Scott Atran - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):547-569.
Psychological Essentialism in Children.S. Gelman - 2004 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (9):404-409.
Citations of this work BETA
Evolved Cognitive Biases and the Epistemic Status of Scientific Beliefs.Helen de Cruz & Johan de Smedt - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 157 (3):411-429.
Human Uniqueness, the Other Hominids, and “Anthropocentrism of the Gaps” in the Religion and Science Dialogue.Joshua M. Moritz - 2012 - Zygon 47 (1):65-96.
Cognitive Science of Religion and the Study of Theological Concepts.Helen De Cruz - 2014 - Topoi 33 (2):487-497.
Indigenous and Scientific Kinds.David Ludwig - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axv031.
Paley's Ipod: The Cognitive Basis of the Design Argument Within Natural Theology.Helen de Cruz & Johan de Smedt - 2010 - Zygon 45 (3):665-684.
Similar books and articles
An Awkward Symmetry: The Tension Between Particle Ontologies and Permutation Invariance.Benjamin Jantzen - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (1):39-59.
A Conceptual Investigation of the Ontological Commensurability of Spatial Data Infrastructures Among Different Cultures.D. J. Saab - 2009 - Earth Science Informatics 2 (4):283-297.
The Unified Medical Language System and the Gene Ontology: Some Critical Reflections.Anand Kumar & Barry Smith - 2003 - In KI 2003: Advances in Artificial Intelligence.
Science and Spirituality Relations Between Two Modes of Cognition: Rational-Scientific and Intuitive-Spiritualã.Abraham Randrup, Axel - unknown
Ontology for Information Systems: Artefacts as a Case Study. [REVIEW]Massimiliano Carrara & Marzia Soavi - 2008 - Mind and Society 7 (2):143-156.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads64 ( #81,885 of 2,168,551 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #187,166 of 2,168,551 )
How can I increase my downloads?