Philosophy of Management 20 (1):75-91 (2021)

Abstract
The field of leadership studies frequently focuses on defining leadership traits in abstraction from the context in which leadership operates. The first aim of this article is to provide a brief overview of reasons why this might be the case. Reasons include: leadership studies being dominated by the perspectives of leaders; the lack of definition and visibility of followership studies; the status and limitations of much qualitative research; and a predominant focus on good leadership. Consequently, many people who experience the effects of leadership, and particularly those of bad leadership, do not recognise their experiences in the literature. However, recognising that followers who experience bad leadership personally increasingly engage in autoethnographic studies, my second aim is to draw out some examples of bad leadership from the autoethnographic literature, as well as their effects. In spite of its negative effects, bad leadership frequently remains unchallenged. My third aim is to explain why this might be the case, where I argue that this stems partly from the pitfalls of autoethnographic studies. I also sketch how these pitfalls might be overcome and how doing so and adopting the principle of ‘accountability for reasonableness’ might help to tackle bad leadership.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s40926-020-00146-w
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,323
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Capitalism and Freedom.Milton Friedman - 1962 - Ethics 74 (1):70-72.
Psychopathic Leadership A Case Study of a Corporate Psychopath CEO.Clive Boddy - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 145 (1):141-156.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Autoethnography, Women and Sport.Karen Throsby - 2018 - In Louise Mansfield, Jayne Caudwell, Belinda Wheaton & Beccy Watson (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Feminism and Sport, Leisure and Physical Education. Palgrave Macmillan Uk. pp. 243-255.
Autoethnography.Anne Bunde-Birouste, Fiona Byrne & Lynn Kemp - 2019 - In Pranee Liamputtong (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer Singapore. pp. 509-526.
Simplicity and Complexity in Contemporary School Leadership: A Response to Grace.Keith Morrison - 2001 - British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (4):379 - 385.
Leadership Ethics: Mapping the Territory.Joanne B. Ciulla - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (1):5-28.
Leadership Ethics: Mapping the Territory.Joanne B. Ciulla - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (1):5-28.
Business Leadership: Three Levels of Ethical Analysis.Daniel E. Palmer - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 88 (S3):525-536.
Responsible Leadership: Learning From Indian Case Studies.Venugopal Pingali - 2016 - Asian Journal of Business Ethics 5 (1-2):139-147.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-08-16

Total views
5 ( #1,171,342 of 2,448,721 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #301,447 of 2,448,721 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes