What Could It Mean to Say That Today's Stand‐Up Audiences Are Too Sensitive?

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (4):501-512 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contemporary comedy audiences are accused by some comedians of being too morally sensitive to appreciate humor. To get closer to an idea of what this means, I will first briefly present the argument over audience sensitivity as found in the non-philosophical literature. Second, I then turn to the philosophical literature and begin from the idea that “funny” is a response-dependent property. I present a criticism of this response-dependence account of “funny” based in the claim that funniness is not de- termined by what normal audiences actually laugh at, but by what merits laughter. Third, I argue that excessive or deficient moral sensitivity distorts audience receptivity to humor. Fourth, I turn to candidates for ideally sensitive audiences. I conclude by returning to the particular cases of supposed oversensitivity or undersensitivity to jokes to see how we might judge them.

Similar books and articles

Baseball Stadiums and American Audiences.Kenneth H. Marcus - 2008 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2008 (143):165-170.
Reductionism Today.Michael Esfeld - 2013 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 17:89-101.
Introduction: Stand‐Up Comedy Today and Tomorrow.Sheila Lintott - 2020 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (4):397-400.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-10

Downloads
239 (#52,053)

6 months
124 (#5,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Phillip Deen
University of New Hampshire, Manchester

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 2003 - In Gary Watson (ed.), Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Dispositional Theories of Value.Michael Smith, David Lewis & Mark Johnston - 1989 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 63 (1):89-174.
The Moralistic Fallacy: On the ”Appropriateness' of Emotions.Daniel Jacobson - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):65-90.
The Moralistic Fallacy: On the 'Appropriateness' of Emotions.Justin D'Arms & Daniel Jacobson - 2000 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):65-90.

View all 22 references / Add more references