Back to Darwin and Popper: Criticism, migration of piecemeal conceptual schemes, and the growth of knowledge
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (2):157-179 (1997)
Popper's thesis that the growth of knowledge lies in the emergence of problems out of criticism and takes place in an autonomous world of products of the human mind (his so-called world-3) raises two questions: (1) Why does criticism lead to new problems, and (2) Why can only a limited number of tentative solutions arise at a given time? I propose the following answer: Criticism entails an overlooked evolutionary world-3 mechanism, namely, the migration of piece meal conceptual schemes from one research tradition to another. Popper by passed the questions above because he relied very heavily on the selective power of criticism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Traditional Rationality Vs. A Tradition of Criticism: A Criticism of Popper's Theory of the Objectivity of Science. [REVIEW]John R. Wettersten - 1978 - Erkenntnis 12 (3):329 - 338.
Popper, Kuhn, Lakatos and Aim-Oriented Empiricism.Nicholas Maxwell - 2005 - Philosophia 32 (1-4):181-239.
The Quixotic Element in the Open Society.Peter Munz - 1997 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (1):39-55.
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge University Press.
Normal Science and its Dangers.Karl Popper - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press. pp. 51--8.
Levels of Criticism: Handling Popperian Problems in a Popperian Way. [REVIEW]Ivor Grattan-Guinness - 2008 - Axiomathes 18 (1):37-48.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #226,207 of 2,164,296 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,296 )
How can I increase my downloads?