British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (1):31-49 (2011)

Max De Gaynesford
University of Reading
If philosophy and poetry are to illuminate each other, we should first understand their tendencies to mutual antipathy. Examining mutual misapprehension is part of this task. J. L. Austin's remarks on poetry offer one such point of entry: they are often cited by poets and critics as an example of philosophy's blindness to poetry. These remarks are complex and their purpose obscure—more so than those who take exception to them usually allow or admit. But it is reasonable to think that, for all his levity at their expense, what Austin offers poets is exemption from forms of commitment. Since such exemption is precisely what poets and critics have sought, this diagnosis is eirenic. This exemption has a price, but it may be affordable.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/aesthj/ayq045
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,916
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Uptake in Action.Maximilian De Gaynesford - 2017 - In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Interpreting J. L. Austin: Critical Essays. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
95 ( #121,249 of 2,497,781 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #428,370 of 2,497,781 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes