Necessary Conditions for Morally Responsible Animal Research

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (4):420-430 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we present three necessary conditions for morally responsible animal research that we believe people on both sides of this debate can accept. Specifically, we argue that, even if human beings have higher moral status than nonhuman animals, animal research is morally permissible only if it satisfies (a) an expectation of sufficient net benefit, (b) a worthwhile-life condition, and (c) a no unnecessary-harm/qualified-basic-needs condition. We then claim that, whether or not these necessary conditions are jointly sufficient conditions of justified animal research, they are relatively demanding with the consequence that many animal experiments may fail to satisfy them.

Similar books and articles

Incompatibilism and the transfer of non-responsibility.Justin Capes - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (6):1477-1495.
Conversation and Responsibility.Michael McKenna - 2011 - Oxford University Press USA.
Ethics and welfare: The case of hunting.Roger Scruton - 2002 - Philosophy 77 (4):543-564.
How to be responsible for something without causing it.Carolina Sartorio - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):315–336.
On being and holding responsible.Chauncey Maher - 2010 - Philosophical Explorations 13 (2):129-140.
A compassionate autonomy alternative to speciesism.Constance K. Perry - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (3):237-246.
Moral Responsibility and Subverting Causes.Andy Taylor - 2010 - Dissertation, University of Reading
Moral responsibility for actions: epistemic and freedom conditions.Alfred Mele - 2010 - Philosophical Explorations 13 (2):101-111.
A problem for guidance control.Patrick Todd & Neal A. Tognazzini - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):685-692.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
1,170 (#5,747)

6 months
105 (#7,655)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jeff Sebo
New York University
David DeGrazia
George Washington University

References found in this work

The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
The Animals Issue.Peter Carruthers - 1993 - Environmental Values 2 (4):370-371.
The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation.Aysha Akhtar - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (4):407-419.

View all 7 references / Add more references