Value theory and the best interests standard

Bioethics 9 (1):50–61 (1995)
The idea of a patient's best interests raises issues in prudential value theory–the study of what makes up an individual's ultimate good or well‐being. While this connection may strike a philosopher as obvious, the literature on the best interests standard reveals almost no engagement of recent work in value theory. There seems to be a growing sentiment among bioethicists that their work is independent of philosophical theorizing. Is this sentiment wrong in the present case? Does value theory make a significant difference in interpreting best interests? In pursuing this question, I begin with a quick sketch of broad kinds of value theories, identifying representatives that are plausible enough to count as contenders. I then explore what each account suggests in neonatal treatment decisions, and decisions for patients in persistent vegetative states. I conclude that while these accounts converge somewhat in their interpretations of best interests, they also have importantly different implications
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00300.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,213
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Limits of Well-Being.Shelly Kagan - 1992 - Social Philosophy and Policy 9 (2):169-189.
Getting Down to Cases: The Revival of Casuistry in Bioethics.John D. Arras - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (1):29-51.
Deciding for Others.Gerald Dworkin, Allen E. Buchanan & Dan W. Brock - 1991 - Philosophical Quarterly 41 (162):118.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Making Good Choices: Toward a Theory of Well-Being in Medicine.Alicia Hall - 2016 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 37 (5):383-400.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Two Arguments Against Biological Interests.Aaron Simmons - 2010 - Environmental Ethics 32 (3):229-245.
Do Embryos Have Interests?Aaron Simmons - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (1):57-66.
An Emotocentric Theory of Interests.Warren Neill - 1998 - Environmental Ethics 20 (2):163-182.
Is Equal Moral Consideration Really Compatible with Unequal Moral Status?John Rossi - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (3):251-276.
Games Machines Play.Wynn C. Stirling - 2002 - Minds and Machines 12 (3):327-352.
Is Payment a Benefit?Alan Wertheimer - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (2):105-116.
Market Hegemony and Economic Theory.Stephen Ellis - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (4):513-532.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

32 ( #157,100 of 2,154,175 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #279,120 of 2,154,175 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums